Thursday, March 5, 2015

Why Sir Ken Robinson Is My Thought-Leader Spirit Animal: 7 Important Ideas on Innovation?

Sir Ken Robinson recently presented a video talk and Q&A at MarketingProfs on the nature of innovation at our own organizations.
Why is innovation critical to all companies? And are we all capable of the creativity and imagination required to fuel real innovation? (Spoiler alert on that last one: YES.)

I’m one of those people who gets antsy at webinars. But last week I was zero percent tempted during Sir Ken’s video talk to start scrolling through my email or to check Instagram.

Part of that was Sir Ken’s delivery – he’s hilarious and articulate. Which makes the big concepts he talks about feel accessible and real and suddenly relevant to all of our lives. 

I came away from Sir Ken’s talk feeling inspired to do things differently within my own organization as well as in the world itself. And when’s the last time that you had that reaction to a marketing webinar?

Here are 7 must-read highlights.

If you’re wanting more, you can watch the whole seminar here at MarketingProfs.

“Innovation has to become a habit…. Innovation needs to be systematic, deliberate; it is what defines you as an organization."

Innovation is simply a habit that should be nurtured, not an art or a gift. In that way, it reminds me of my philosophy toward writing as a habit, not an art.
“Make innovation part of the daily conversation,” Sir Ken said.

"Innovation feeds on itself."

When the iPhone came out, in 2007, there were a few hundred apps for it. Now, there are a ka-frickin-zillion. (That’s not Sir Ken’s word, it’s mine.)

“You can now download an app that turns your iPhone into a blues harmonica,” Ken said. “Why? I have a blues harmonica that’s smaller than the iPhone…” 

The bigger point is that tools and technologies allow us to channel creativity and innovation in new, unexpected ways. “Tools stretch our minds in new directions. They allow us to do things, but also tools extend our minds.”

“Innovation feeds on itself. It becomes pat of a multiplier effect” in which things are launched that were unanticipated by the original design or intent, Sir Ken said.

"Organizations are mortal."

Organizations are mortal – most last only 30 to 40 years. And they don’t survive if they don’t evolve.

“Companies are living organisms; if they don’t evolve, they simply don’t make it. Innovation isn’t an option,” Sir Ken said.

One good example is Kodak. They invented the brownie camera, which Sir Ken called “the iPad of its day.” The Brownie camera made photography accessible to everyone, and as a result Kodak went on to be the dominant force in photography.

Now the company is in receivership. Kodak didn’t fail because people stopped taking photographs – we take more photos, not less (“an irritating number,” said Sir Ken in a mock grouse). 

Rather, Kodak failed because it didn’t adapt to a digital culture and instead bet its future on film – “when things really went quite differently, of course,” he said.

Kodak was created by chemists and run by chemists, and Sir Ken speculated that that might’ve contributed to a kind of innovation blind spot.

“Kodak created a habit of mind, a culture that stopped them from innovating,” Sir Ken said.

"The second driver of innovation is the sheer number of people on the planet."

"There are currently 7 ½ billion people in the world – more than any other time in our history. By the middle of the century, there will be an estimated 9 billion. Much of the population growth is expected to come from emerging or developing economies.

That may affect the future of your own organization. But more broadly, it’s also likely to affect our collective futures.

More people means more need for food, fuel and water. Beyond the question of whether our planet can handle the growth is the question, “In what fashion?” Sir Ken said. If we all consumed resources as most people do in India, the earth could sustain 15 billion people, he said. But if we all consume fuel, food and water as we do in North America, the earth could sustain a mere 1.5 billion. 

“Which means that by the end of the century, we’re going to need another 4 or 5 planets to accommodate us all,” Sir Ken said.

"Creativity is the applied wing of imagination."

Innovation is the drive to find new ideas and new ways of doing things, to launch both new products and better processes. “But you can’t go straight to it,” he said, because the foundation for innovation are two things: Imagination and creativity.

Imagination gives you the freedom to consider alternative views. Creativity is about applying imagination to existing systems – to challenge what we take for granted. It’s the process of figuring out if your imagined, original ideas have value.

“Creativity is the applied wing of imagination,” Sir Ken said. And innovation comes from the application of that creativity in context in an organizational context.

"Creative does not equal artistic."

“A myth is that you’re either creative or you’re not,” Sir Ken said.

“Creative” does not equal “artistic.” You can be a creative team leader or a creative scientist or a creative marketer – which means only that you look for new ways of doing things.

We all have creative capacity. But most organizations don’t give people permission to be creative.

In an organization, he added, “Culture is about where you lay the lines of permission.”

I wrote a full post on this one alone here

"Great ideas aren't accidental."

“Creativity is a process, not an event,” Sir Ken said
Pixar bans no or but during company meetings. Great ideas aren’t accidental – rather, they come from a practiced point of view which encourages new ideas and innovation.
Support a “yes and…” brand of improvisation at your own organization, Sir Ken said. In comic improv, the actors accept what those around them suggest and work with it – you accept what you’ve been given and build on it, saying yes and instead of no orbut

Banning no and but might “sound trivial,” Sir Ken said. “It’s really not.”

If you’re a creative leader, he added, it’s not your job to have all the great ideas. Instead, it’s your job to allow those you lead to contribute as well.
“Take that weight off yourself,” he said.

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Pebble vs. Apple: David and Goliath This Ain't

By this time next week Apple will have, once again, sucked all the oxygen out of the room. Next Monday, at one of the company's time-tested high-profile events, we'll all be attending the coming out party for Apple Watch.
But this week, the smart watch news is all about Pebble, which can reasonably claim to have energized the space three years ago in a very Apple way: Exploding onto the scene with a breakthrough device someone else thought of first.
Pebble returned to Kickstarter last week in a bald attempt to capitalize on the smart watch buzz created by Apple's imminent entry into the space with Pebble Time, a sportier model with a new approach to notifications it calls Timeline. They've promised a month of news, timed to the 30-day campaign, which includes today's reveal of — surprise! — an upgrade option to Pebble Time Steel, a steal at only $80 more than the (long since taken) $170 batch (Yes, I'm in. Again).
Pebble and Apple isn't David and Goliath, at least not as far as Pebble CEO Eric Migicovsky is concerned. "Whether delusional, manically focused or simply well-rehearsed, Migicovsky chose to view the Apple announcement as a plus for Pebble," Steven Levy writes in Backchannel. 'It’s pretty incredible to see the world’s largest company come into the watch space,' he said. 'It’s validating something I’ve known for the last six and a half years — that the next generation of computing will be on your body.'"
What is undeniably true is that Pebble has sold more than one million watches in three years, and six days into a 30-day Kickstarter campaign, has sold another $14 million worth. With that, the company has re-claimed the title (it first took with the original Pebble) as the most funded Kickstarter project ever.
So, there is that.
first took notice of Pebble in my Reuters column when they broke all records on their first Kickstarter campaign, in April 2012:
A Kickstarter project for a device you wear on your wrist, but that needs a smartphone to do anything really interesting, has raised more than $5.3 million in eight days. This is this far and away the most anyone has ever raised on Kickstarter, and it’s happening – with a gadget in a category that has a pretty dismal track record – at a sales pace that would make even Apple sit up and take notice.
As much as I like to dine out on those last words, I'm not really sure Apple did "sit up take notice" as much as it might have already been working on the idea for quite some time.
The smart watch has all the earmarks of the sort of device-that-time-forgot Apple often manages to turn into something relevant. Microsoft had tried and failed with it a decade before the first Pebble (note the similarities to the tablet, which Apple reinvented a decade after the Redmond giant tried to market its own). Various kinds of smart watch have been around ever since, getting little love. Even Pebble was going nowhere fast as a developer of a device tethered to Blackberry phones, which were about to fall off a cliff.
What changed? Two very important, intertwined things.
Smart watches were originally conceived of as stand-alone devices. The limitations are now pretty obvious, chiefly the tiny screen. Remember, though, at the time ofMicrosoft's SPOT, watch screens on mobile phones were also pretty tiny.
But they didn't do all that much. Unlike the Dick Tracy device people of a certain age remember fondly you couldn't even talk to anyone with it. I mean, we KNEW that watches were communications devices in the early 1960s. So why aren't they in the year 2002?!
Apple went a long way towards setting the stage for the emergence of the smart phone as must-have mobile device in 2007, with the first iPhone. Among the new features was a ginormous screen, which made activities like web surfing credible on a mobile device. So successful was the smart phone that it created a new version of a problem futurist Alvin Toffler had identified in 1970: information overloadHard core techies, like Gigaom's Mathew Ingram, would soon argue that you should choose a smart phone based on how well they wrangled notifications above all other features.
And that was the new opening for the resurgence of the smart watch. The trick, from my perspective, is to avoid mission creep. It is to remember that the opportunity lies in extending the utility of the smart phone, not replacing it.
But the existential question about whether smart watches are a mainstream consumer item is valid. Notification management is pretty hard core. One new use case: There are unique health monitoring opportunities for something strapped to your wrist. Pebble steals a little of that thunder today — surprise! — with a reveal that of the smartstrap: "straps can now contain electronics and sensors to interface directly with apps running on Pebble Time."
Apple may bury Pebble, or its entry into the smart watch space might lift all boats — even Android, whose fans will tell you already boasts a range of excellent choices with features Apple will reinvent, or steal, depending on your point of view.
So, for a smart watch aficionado these are exciting times. If Apple is wildly successful, look to them to even extend coverage to Android devices, like iTunes spread to Windows. Apple's entry is a make-or-break event which will answer whether there is a massive, pent-up hunger for this kind of device, or whether it's only a play thing for people like me.
Either way, it's about time.